| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:01 am Post subject:
Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
Hi, can anyone clue me into to exactly what external factors effect the
share price of inflation protected bond funds?
thanks!
Geoff
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Herb
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:45 am Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
<ghusic@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131408294.345677.261090@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Hi, can anyone clue me into to exactly what external factors effect the
share price of inflation protected bond funds?
thanks!
Geoff
|
Supply and demand. ;-)
-herb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ghusic@gmail.com
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:01 am Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
I appreciate the answer, but it doesn't help much. let me clarify. What
exactly would the external economic conditions be that would cuase the
demand for an inflation protected bond fund to ebb or wane?
Geoff
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elle
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:01 am Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
IIRC, inflation protected bond funds behave about the same way as investment
grade bond funds of similar duration. As interest rates rise, their NAV
falls, but the yield of course goes up.
IMO, it's a good time to start a bond ladder and so, within the ladder, hold
bonds to maturity.
<ghusic@gmail.com> wrote
| Quote: | I appreciate the answer, but it doesn't help much. let me clarify. What
exactly would the external economic conditions be that would cuase the
demand for an inflation protected bond fund to ebb or wane? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rono
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
Hi Geoff,
The primary consideration would be the ANTICIPATION of inflation in the
coming months or years. I say anticipation because existing inflation
is a done deal and until it gets way out of hand, doesn't have as much
impact as the Anticipation of future inflation in my opinion.
And this is the primary difference in the decision making process a
bond buyer has to go thru. Normal bonds hate inflation in a big way.
They make the original bond worth less in inflated dollars and they
normally stimulate interest rate increases (to fight it) which also
decrease the value of your existing bond.
For example, if I buy a 10K bond that pays 5% and two years later rates
go up to 6% no one will buy my 5% bond unless I sell it at a discount
to par so that the yield equates to 6%. The reverse is true on the
downside. If I own a 6% bond and rates drop so that new bonds are only
going at a 5% rate, I'm going to want more than 10K for my bond should
I desire to sell it.
I-bonds and TIPs have taken the inflation issue out of the bond buyers
decision because they protect you against inflation. Normally,
however, they offer a lower rate of return ON FACE, but should
inflation actually occur, not only protect you from the nastyness
outlined above, but actually return you an increased payout.
Think of bonds as a defensive play - relative to equites. Folks who
buy bonds want a yield, but particularly want safety and preservation
of capital. Well, the greatest threat to both of those is inflation.
Ergo - inflation protected bonds.
Now where does the anticipation of future inflation arise? commodity
prices, energy prices, retail, wages, union contracts with cola's, too
much money being printed, etc.
best,
rono |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ghusic@gmail.com
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
thanks, Rono. that helps a great deal!
Geoff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darkness39
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
ghusic@gmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | Hi, can anyone clue me into to exactly what external factors effect the
share price of inflation protected bond funds?
thanks!
Geoff
|
expected inflation.
Real interest rates (expected).
Break-even inflation rate is a way of pricing these bonds against
nominal bonds of the same maturity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ghusic@gmail.com
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
One follow up, Rono. The fund I am looking at is the one in TIAA-CREF
(TIILX). I imagine it holds bonds of a variety of maturities. Does that
mean the the share price should generally be more stable? It seems like
the motivation for demand for such a fund would be a little more
complex than for a single bond, no?
thanks again
Geoff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darkness39
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:18 pm Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
ghusic@gmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | One follow up, Rono. The fund I am looking at is the one in TIAA-CREF
(TIILX). I imagine it holds bonds of a variety of maturities. Does that
mean the the share price should generally be more stable? It seems like
the motivation for demand for such a fund would be a little more
complex than for a single bond, no?
thanks again
Geoff
|
Yes.
The volatility of a bond price is driven by:
- credit risk - since all these bonds are US govt, the risk should be
the same
- liquidity - in principle, more bonds means more liquid bonds,
therefore smaller price jumps (lots of caveats in that)
- maturity - the fund will have a spread of maturities and therefore
moves in the interest rate 'yield curve' will have less dramatic
effects than they would on a single bond with a long time to maturity
(but more than a with a short time to maturity)
The key measure of the last is 'duration'. A fund with a longer
duration than an individual bond will, in theory, be more volatile than
its shorter duration counterpart.
Duration for TIPS is tricky. In a fixed rate bond, you just have to
make an assumption about how the coupons from the bond are reinvested
(so for example, a stripped bond, with no coupons, has a duration
exactly equal to its time to maturity). However for TIPS, the
principal of the bond is adjusted for inflation, and we don't know what
that inflation will be over say the remaining 20 year life of the bond.
So the duration calculation is more complex. It is fair to say in
general that the duration of a TIPS is normally longer than the
duration of a fixed rate (nominal) bond, for the same maturity (because
you get more of your money at the end, in the increase in the face
value of the bond due to inflation).
Assuming a low MER for the fund, in general I favour a small investor
holding a bond fund (TIPS) over holding individual bonds: as a small
trader in individual bonds, you face big dealing spreads (buy v. sell),
and you are not always liquid.
If your plan is to hold to maturity, then the factor in the above
paragraph is not as important. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rono
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
Hi Geoff,
Darkness had a good response.
Actually with a bond fund, you are more exposed to inflation risk than
if you actually held the bond from issue to maturity. This is because
a bond fund is constantly buying and selling bonds and who knows if
they hold however many to maturity. This means that inflation risk as
personified by rising rates can hammer them with regard to principal
(your NAV goes down even while you're still earning nice interest
coupons.) This is why in a rising rates environment, you generally
want to be in short term bonds vs. longer. - you want to wait until
rates are UP before locking your money in for a long time.
Inflation protected bonds funds obviate the pure inflation threat
because of their nature. However, they do NOT obviate the threat of
rising rates. Which rules? Geez, who knows.
For the bond portion of my wife's portfolio, we split it between
Inflation Protected, Short Term, Intermediate Term Corporate and the
Bond Index fund (all of this is at Vanguard). Our only exposure to
longer term risk is via the latter. The TIPs is as a hedge. However,
she also owns some I-bonds (buy them directly from the treasure at
their website treasureydirect.gov). And for that matter she's got a
small stack of gold eagles, owns vanguards precious metals funds and
has about 15% overall in varioius natural resource type plays - all
hedges against inflation.
Inflation protected bonds are simply one avenue to cover your ass.
If you're at TIAA-CREF, I'd divy up the bond portion of your portfolio
to INCLUDE the TIP fund, but have some short term (to move to longer
term should rates continue to rise) and get a little better yield with
an intermediate term corporate bond fund.
best,
rono
One follow up, Rono. The fund I am looking at is the one in TIAA-CREF
(TIILX). I imagine it holds bonds of a variety of maturities. Does that
mean the the share price should generally be more stable? It seems like
the motivation for demand for such a fund would be a little more
complex than for a single bond, no?
thanks again
Geoff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ed
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
"rono" <overtonr@cablespeed.com> wrote
.. - you want to wait until
| Quote: | rates are UP before locking your money in for a long time.
|
Of course the problem remains, what is "up"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rono
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:21 am Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
Howdy Ed, you old rascal,
Hey, what's UP to me, might not be to you. ;-)
Actually, I think UP is best defined in relation to expected returns
from other sources, particularly equities. And this needs to be be
adjusted for Risk. If you can lock in a longer term bond for 7-8% or
so, relative to an expected return from stocks of 9-10%, then
considering the reduced risk of bonds, they become attractive.
Our taxable account is a perfect example. It consists of mostly blue
chip dividend paying stocks that also have some growth. We also have a
couple that are strictly growth with little or no dividend. One fund
and that's Tocqueville Gold TGLDX. Now the dividend yield from this
account has been around 2.5% overall. In an effort to juice this, I've
been buying into a CEF that invests in municipal bonds from michigan -
MIY. It's yield is 6.36%. However, that's a tax free yield, so my net
yield is ~8.3+%. Well, relative to stocks and their inate risk, this
is pretty gd good.
As for our current rate environment, I'd suggest waiting until the fed
is done raising rates and then DCA into longer term bond funds.
Pundits have them stopping after two more hikes and that would mean
January as the end point for this current round of increases. However,
I'd DCA my shorter term stuff just to cover my ass in case inflation
manifests itself somewhere and they're forced to react.
take care, old friend,
rono |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loose On the Lead
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:01 am Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
rono wrote:
| Quote: | Actually with a bond fund, you are more exposed to inflation risk than
if you actually held the bond from issue to maturity.
|
This is a myth. Bonds behave the same way outside a fund as they do
inside. If you hold to maturity, you don't see a loss on paper, but
that doesn't mean you haven't lost something in real terms.
Darin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ell
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:47 am Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
"Loose On the Lead" <dts2172-ng@yahoo.com> wrote
| Quote: | rono wrote:
Actually with a bond fund, you are more exposed to inflation risk than
if you actually held the bond from issue to maturity.
This is a myth. Bonds behave the same way outside a fund as they do
inside. If you hold to maturity, you don't see a loss on paper, but
that doesn't mean you haven't lost something in real terms.
|
And this is incredibly poor writing.
Bonds held to maturity: Principal is returned.
Bonds held in a fund: Principal is not necessarily returned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loose On the Lead
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:01 am Post subject:
Re: Inflation protected bonds |
|
|
Ell wrote:
| Quote: | "Loose On the Lead" <dts2172-ng@yahoo.com> wrote
rono wrote:
Actually with a bond fund, you are more exposed to inflation risk than
if you actually held the bond from issue to maturity.
This is a myth. Bonds behave the same way outside a fund as they do
inside. If you hold to maturity, you don't see a loss on paper, but
that doesn't mean you haven't lost something in real terms.
And this is incredibly poor writing.
|
Funny you should write that after misspelling your own name.
| Quote: | Bonds held to maturity: Principal is returned.
Bonds held in a fund: Principal is not necessarily returned.
|
That's wonderful, as long as all you care about is getting your
principal back. Some people are more interested in long-term total
return, in which case holding a bond to maturity is not always the best
course of action. And that brings me to the inflation issue, which I
forgot to address directly the first time around. A bond held in a
mutual fund is the same as a bond held individually. When a bond in a
mutual fund is sold, the sale presumably takes place because the
manager thinks he can improve returns by holding a different bond. If
the manager is right, then clearly the fund keeps up with inflation
better than the original bond would have on its own. If he's wrong, it
doesn't.
Regarding TIPS, Rono and Darkness are right. TIPS behavior is
complicated.
Darin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|