| Author |
Message |
maxima
Guest
|
 Posted:
Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:02 am Post subject:
Re: Canadian Dollar |
|
|
ProfitMaxTrading.com wrote:
| Quote: | Maxima,
You are correct that some terminology may be interpreted slightly different
from one to another. And perhaps using the 'layman' terms may assist some.
Unfortunately the 'intimidators' take pride in the shield of ignorance and
provocation that no terms will suffice.
The terms I use are not of my own making. They are what they are (as I'm
sure you know). A market top or bottom is clearly a top or bottom. How long
it remains as such is only relevant if that is the information discovered
and being provided. I only wish to report the points in time where cycles
suggest a 'turn' or 'pivot'.
While one is not busy trying to find rocks to throw, such time can be put
towards actually noting what is being said. A swing or pivot bottom clearly
implies that price shall rise from the low (ie. Pivot higher). And a swing
or pivot top implies that price shall decline (ie Pivot lower).
You know this, I know this, and most others know this also. But for the few
that try to feel better about their obvious failings by downplaying the
achievements of others, it will not matter what we say or how we say it.
:-)
-Rick
"maxima" <Maxima@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:yO6dnT429uebc8LenZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@rogers.com...
Best way is direct approach.
Try use layman term 'will Pivot higher' or 'will Pivot lower' and provide
a estimate expected moving price range should easily shut those jerks
mouth for awhile.
I suppose they try intimidate you with a magic bullet for their desperate
trading segregated acct fund.
*** JOKING ***
|
I still prefer Straight forward over jargons, and could benefit the
beginners whom still in the learning phase. Isn't it we all posters in
here trying to share regardless what's the motif behind?
Try leave a disclaimer or statement at the end of each new posts to
protect yourselves. If any brutal blindly bombardments, they are proven
uneducated fool of themselves for all to laugh at. I envy you with the
attentions, which my posts have non, especially those useful opinions
when needed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mail Man
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:06 pm Post subject:
Re: Canadian Dollar |
|
|
I received the post in question at 11:16 PM (PDT), Oct 24, 2005. Ratchford
posts in the Central Time Zone, so this would equate to 1:16 AM (CDT), Oct
25, 2005, EXACTLY the same as Ratchford's file date and, as Ratchford says,
BEFORE THE FACT! To me, the Google time stamp you showed us makes no sense.
Mike Collier
Oak Harbor, WA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
random
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:48 pm Post subject:
Re: Canadian Dollar |
|
|
Google showed for my post:
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:33:15 GMT
Local: Thurs, Oct 27 2005 9:33 pm
and also:
time test 4 google
random - Oct 27, 9:33 pm
now: 27 oct 9:32 pm (the time sent)
and it showes:
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:16:54 -0500
Local: Tues, Oct 25 2005 4:16 pm
and also:
Canadian Dollar
ProfitMaxTrading.com - Oct 25, 4:16 pm
Once again is Google wrong?
It was correct for my local time 15000kms away, can it be wrong for yours in
Chicago?
"ProfitMaxTrading.com" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ho68f.669$0M1.430@dukeread12...
| Quote: | It would appear that in your haste to discredit my forecast you overlooked
something as basic as time differences for these servers. The evidence,
that being your 'time test 4 google' and Massimo's post from Italy clearly
indicate that the time I stated/posted is correct and that there is a
difference in time stamp.
Google is stamping 3 hours later.
So perhaps in the future as you are picking up stones to toss, you might
consider the time differences and not be so quick to assume. All my
forecasts, every one of them, year after year, are 'before-the-fact'. I'm
not stupid to be posting 'afterwards' nor consider that useful.
-R
"random" <no@spam.com.au> wrote in message
news:Hb38f.2229$Hj2.942@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
http://groups.google.com.au/group/misc.invest.futures/browse_thread/thread/11096720f4846306/d24e6aa03e7786ab#d24e6aa03e7786ab
Well google does'nt agree with you :
ProfitMaxTrading.com Oct 25, 4:16 pm show options
Newsgroups: misc.invest.futures
From: "ProfitMaxTrading.com" <nos...@nospam.com> - Find
messages by this author
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:16:54 -0500
Local: Tues, Oct 25 2005 4:16 pm
Subject: Canadian Dollar
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message
| Show original | Report Abuse
The 10/24 daily price bar is likely to form a pivot bottom based on
daily
cycles and price being oversold at the 10/24 low. Look for CD$ to
rally
Is there such a time difference from Chicago? From 4:16pm (local) to 1:16
am?
In my test post the "local time" was my actual local time, not the US
time.
Is Google wrong?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maxima
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:02 am Post subject:
Re: Canadian Dollar |
|
|
random wrote:
| Quote: | Google showed for my post:
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:33:15 GMT
Local: Thurs, Oct 27 2005 9:33 pm
and also:
time test 4 google
random - Oct 27, 9:33 pm
now: 27 oct 9:32 pm (the time sent)
and it showes:
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:16:54 -0500
Local: Tues, Oct 25 2005 4:16 pm
and also:
Canadian Dollar
ProfitMaxTrading.com - Oct 25, 4:16 pm
Once again is Google wrong?
It was correct for my local time 15000kms away, can it be wrong for yours in
Chicago?
"ProfitMaxTrading.com" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ho68f.669$0M1.430@dukeread12...
It would appear that in your haste to discredit my forecast you overlooked
something as basic as time differences for these servers. The evidence,
that being your 'time test 4 google' and Massimo's post from Italy clearly
indicate that the time I stated/posted is correct and that there is a
difference in time stamp.
Google is stamping 3 hours later.
So perhaps in the future as you are picking up stones to toss, you might
consider the time differences and not be so quick to assume. All my
forecasts, every one of them, year after year, are 'before-the-fact'. I'm
not stupid to be posting 'afterwards' nor consider that useful.
-R
"random" <no@spam.com.au> wrote in message
news:Hb38f.2229$Hj2.942@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
http://groups.google.com.au/group/misc.invest.futures/browse_thread/thread/11096720f4846306/d24e6aa03e7786ab#d24e6aa03e7786ab
Well google does'nt agree with you :
ProfitMaxTrading.com Oct 25, 4:16 pm show options
Newsgroups: misc.invest.futures
From: "ProfitMaxTrading.com" <nos...@nospam.com> - Find
messages by this author
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:16:54 -0500
Local: Tues, Oct 25 2005 4:16 pm
Subject: Canadian Dollar
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message
| Show original | Report Abuse
The 10/24 daily price bar is likely to form a pivot bottom based on
daily
cycles and price being oversold at the 10/24 low. Look for CD$ to
rally
Is there such a time difference from Chicago? From 4:16pm (local) to 1:16
am?
In my test post the "local time" was my actual local time, not the US
time.
Is Google wrong?
Get a live. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in